A FAIR FINDING

Disciplinary Chamber

The Disciplinary Chamber determines whether a particular member, officer or other person covered by the rules committed a violation.

I

A fair decision about an alleged violation

The Disciplinary Chamber determines whether a particular member, officer or other person covered by the rules committed a violation.

An accusation is not a finding. The Chamber exists so political leaders cannot punish opponents simply by calling them disloyal.

II

Why discipline must be independent

The Provincial Executive may be involved in the dispute or benefit from the outcome. It therefore cannot be the final investigator, prosecutor and judge.

Independent review protects the complainant, the person accused and the credibility of the union.

III

How the Chamber is chosen

Convention elects the Chamber in advance. It begins its five-year term one year after Convention, while the Constitutional Chamber begins the following year.

The staggered cycle prevents all independent bodies from changing with the same political moment.

IV

How a case works

A complaint is filed under published rules. The person affected receives notice, knows the allegation, can answer it and can present relevant information before a reasoned decision is made.

The exact procedure is prepared by a special working group and approved by Convention. It must comply with the Constitution and basic fairness.

V

Its role in temporary replacement

If the Chamber finds that a Vice-President or President committed a disqualifying violation, the Executive applies the approved temporary replacement process.

The Chamber finds the violation; it does not quietly choose the political replacement. Those responsibilities remain separate.

VI

Independence and appeal

Quorum is 67 percent of the full Chamber. The Executive, President, Council and staff cannot remove its members or order a result.

Only Convention may end a term. The final decision may be challenged in court.